Vol 20, No 3. They like paired discussions, self-analysis questionnaires, personality questionnaires, time out, observing activities, feedback from others. They learn better through taking time to think about how to apply learning in reality, case studies, problem solving and discussion.
They respond to problems and opportunities 'as a challenge'. They are gregarious people constantly involving themselves with others but, in doing so, they seek to centre all activities around themselves.
Their philosophy is to be cautious. Pragmatist Pragmatists are keen on trying out ideas, theories and techniques to see if they work in practice. Having an experience Drawing their own conclusions theorizing Putting their theory into practice to see what happens Based on the result, the learners can then move around the cycle again, jump in any part of the cycle, and then quit when they deem them self as successful learned the task or material.
Notes Updated July 12, They are thoughtful people who like to consider all possible angles and implications before making a move. They may abstain from jumping in and prefer to watch from the sidelines.
Honey and Mumford — University of Leicester. And to be an effective learner, individuals must know about their learning styles or preferences and find ways to learn using those methods. These individuals have the capacity to perceive how to put the learning into practice in their present reality.
Their model looks similar to this: They approach new tasks with eagerness and excel in high-pressure situations. They prefer to maximise certainty and feel uncomfortable with subjective judgements, lateral thinking and anything flippant.
Activists are open-minded when it comes to learning, too. The learning activities can be brainstorming, problem solving, group discussion, puzzles, competitions, role-play etc Theorists: They are gregarious people constantly involving themselves with others but, in doing so, they seek to centre all activities around themselves.
They do not make assumptions without undertaking thorough research and analysis. They approach new tasks with eagerness and excel in high-pressure situations. They tend to thrive on the challenge of new experiences but are bored with implementation and longer term consolidation.
They tackle problems by brainstorming. They are pretty stubborn with their own ideas and hardly ever pays attention to an idea that may contradict theirs and finally pragmatists like to be practical.
Pragmatist Pragmatists are keen on trying out ideas, theories and techniques to see if they work in practice. They do not allow their emotions to affect the conclusions they make when learning and instead question everything.
They tackle problems by brainstorming. They listen to others and get the drift of the discussion before making their own points. They have a receptive way to deal with learning, including themselves completely and without inclination in new encounters.
They prefer to take part in activities that allow them to think before acting, undertake research and watch events unfold from the sidelines. These learners get a kick out of the chance to comprehend the hypothesis behind the activities.
They positively search out new ideas and take the first opportunity to experiment with applications. Their approach to problems is consistently logical.
Likes to use journals and brainstorming. Theorist likes to remain logical and look at things in a rational way. To help with finding the correct learning style or preference, Honey and Mumford have developed a questionnaire built on a continuum as the figure shows below.
Learning style Activist Activists involve themselves fully and without bias in new experiences. They assimilate disparate facts into coherent theories. Likes anything new, problem solving, and small group discussions. They prefer to take a back seat in meetings and discussions.How Different Honey And Mumford And Kolb Theory Honey and Mumford Peter Honey and Alan Mumford developed their learning based on the work of Kolb.
Their preferred learning styles are Activist, Pragmatist, Theorist and Reflector. Honey and Mumford's variation on the Kolb system. The terms 'activist', 'reflector', 'theorist', and 'pragmatist' are often used to represent the four key stages (or learning steps) in Kolb's model of personality learning joeshammas.com they are actually from a learning types model developed by Honey and Mumford.
Learning styles were developed by Peter Honey and Alan Mumford, based upon the work of Kolb, and they identified four distinct learning styles or preferences: Activist, Theorist; Pragmatist and Reflector. These are the learning approaches that individuals naturally prefer and they recommend that in order to maximise one's own personal learning.
There is a strong similarity between the Honey and Mumford styles/stages and the corresponding Kolb learning styles: Activist = Accommodating; Reflector = Diverging; Theorist = Assimilating; Pragmatist = Converging; Most people learn by all four, but tend to have one or two dominant traits.
For example, Honey and Mumford's model, Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ), is directly derived from Kolb's theory. Honey and Mumford () note their debt to Kolb's theory, however, they also note that they produced their own Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) because they found that Kolb's LSI had low face validity with.
If you like the Theorist route, you might be aching to read up on how Messrs.
Honey and Mumford developed their theory. And if that's the case, take a peek at Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory, since Honey and Mumford partially based their ideas on Kolb's work.Download