Evaluating historical views of leadership

A historical narrative study. They hold that there is no precise method to lead because both internal and external environmental factors require leaders to adapt to particular situations.

Leaders implementing this style achieve high staff turnover, but limit organizational achievement and growth of followers. On the other hand, Machiavelli suggested that the results are the most important element of the efforts of a leader and the leader should obtain the positive results by whatever means possible including manipulation and deceit as cited in Wren, In addition, the behavioural characteristics or personality traits are inherent in families and are genetically passed from one generation to another.

In his writings, he emphasized the importance of formal education for black youth via colleges and universities. Autocratic leadership has failed due to its shortcomings and the more privileges and rights of leaders.

Despite these differences, the theories share some features about leadership. Lao-tzu was a Chinese sage, who was Evaluating historical views of leadership a man of profound wisdom by his followers.

Weber notes that situational theories that later evolved to argue that there is no better leadership style, as these styles can be either effective or ineffective depending on a situation. Analysis The various elements of military leadership as described in the Modern Military Leadership section can be summarized as a morality, b high level of training and skill, c maintenance of authority and order and d maintenance of a leadership hierarchy within the organization.

The Evolution of leadership: In addition, it emphasizes voluntary actions of followers. Transformational leaders later evolved, and they were believed to motivate and inspire followers by assisting them to seek the highest value from a task.

A major theme in the ancient world view is that leaders have as their charge the maintenance of authority, power, and order. Wren notes that trait theories assume inherent capacity of leaders, portraying them as heroic, mythic, or destined leaders, who display their leadership traits when they are most needed.

Conclusion While trait, behavioural and situational theories have aided in understanding leadership, none of them provided complete and satisfactory leadership explanations leading to the advancement of leadership. The perfection of a leader comes with years of education Plato,as cited in Wren, Some of these theories were born in the minds of scholars of the past, while others are currently being developed in efforts to improve conditions at present.

Evaluating historical views of leadership

Machiavelli also penned the Discourses, which defined the benefits of a republic according to his standard Wren, They did not simply act based on their own theory, but also produced writings to be used as framework for others.

Wren adds that early research on leadership focussed on already successful leaders, such as aristocratic leaders who achieved their positions through inheritance.

Exploring the role of leadership in the evolution of organizational culture in a Theme Park Company: The military leader must be a philanthropist with an active interest in others; General Schwarzkopf during the Gulf war used the term love in showing respect for others Mann, These included participative leadership, which suggested ideal leadership styles as those that consider the input of others.

This is still applicable today as professionals can seize opportunities and take advantage of educational, training, and other job-related opportunities for advancement. He also detailed the importance of leaders embodying good qualities, such as: While certainly not advocating leading by deception, there are times when leaders must act without the full support of followers.

Trait theories hold that leaders are born, while behavioural theories argue that leaders learn through experiences and observations.

He promoted the use of manipulation for the purposes of satisfying the self-interests of the leader.

Evaluating historical views of leadership

Du Bois and Lao-tzu demonstrated that they had faith in the abilities of their followers to make progress by their own actions.

His writings indicated that he believed in ruling by any means necessary. In his writings, he emphasized the importance of formal education for black youth via colleges and universities.

They argue that different leadership styles are more appropriate for various decision-making that affect followers. Plato suggested that the philosopher kings are to be rulers of the hive, the king himself, and other citizens as cited in Wren, Leadership in transactional theories was based on rewards and punishment systems.

No one ancient view of leadership exactly matches the design of modern military leadership. Sun Tzu in his work, The Art of War, began his discussion with the value of the moral law as cited in Stallard, The authors argue that this voluntary nature of followership is the distinguishing factor between leadership and other influential types of formal authority.

Evaluating historical views of leadership Evaluating historical views of leadership Over the years, leadership has evolved through three major phases, namely trait, behavioural, and situational. Leaders must be capable of assessing situations, formulating the best approaches, and acting in the best interest of those they serve.

However, he stressed that they must be able to balance these qualities to suit given situations. Leaders must be capable of assessing situations, formulating the best approaches, and acting in the best interest of those they serve.We will write a custom essay sample on Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership specifically for you for only $ $/page.

Order now The most glaring is the emphasis on education and a class based system that focuses on what he termed, just social order.

A” just social order” is defined as “one where order and harmony are. The process of evaluating historical aspects of leadership involved critically analyzing the commonalities and disparities among a group of influential leaders, such as Thomas Carlyle, Mohandas Gandhi, Niccolo Machiavelli and W.E.B Du Bois.

Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership March 9, University of Phoenix Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership This paper evaluates the leadership views of Plato, Aristotle, Lao-Tzu, and Machiavelli from the point of view.

Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership This paper evaluates the leadership views of Plato, Aristotle, Lao-Tzu, and Machiavelli from the point of view of the modern military leader. The process of evaluation includes an examination of the commonalities and disparities between these views of leadership.

Here is the best resource for homework help with LDR A: Leadership Theories and Practice at University Of Phoenix. Find LDRA study guides, notes, and Find Study Resources.

Main Menu; by School Analyzing and Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership Paper Final Draft. 6 pages. Week 3 Analyzing and Evaluating Historical Views of.

Whatever personal views arise after reviewing these masterworks there are some truths furthering the argument that leadership theory is an ever evolving door and a melting pot of ideas derived from many figures throughout history.

Download
Evaluating historical views of leadership
Rated 0/5 based on 27 review