An analysis of the flaws of shakespeares richard ii and macbeth

Analyzing Richard III and Macbeth by William Shakespeare

Othello Maybe the most perfectly realized of the tragedies, Othello captivated me. Imagery, spirituality and universality are dealt with as the central concerns of the two plays.

Is York an indicator of how our sympathies should go? His career is a downward one. A character analysis of the role of Brutus in the play. This was my third time reading it, and the thought ever at the front of my mind was that one could easily find great new stores of value in it no matter how many times they read it.

With an Introduction and Notes.

Help with macbeth coursework

Anchor, ll—rpt. The concept of a weak and foolish king in conflict with nobility is examined in each work, and language and action are contrasted in the two plays.

In the process of all this bloodshed, Macbeth makes an important point about the nature of violence: The philosophy and psychology of love expounded in William Shakespeare's works is examined. The basic elements of tragic irony and hubris in the two plays are compared, with the classical unities of the Greek play contrasted with the Shakespearean tragedy for its treatment of regicide and the tragic hero.

He tells Macduff of his reproachable qualities—among them a thirst for personal power and a violent temperament, both of which seem to characterize Macbeth perfectly. Hamlet, though he loads himself with reproaches of cowardice, yet remains inactive, and never does justice to himself.

Richard in effect reduces tragedy to melodrama […]. When once he has attained the object of his ambition, Macbeth's character undergoes a change. Anyway, Henry VI is pious and good and therefore? A more plausible approach is that, a playwright would be more concerned about creating and developing interesting plays than inspiring his ideas according to acting abilities in a sadly androcentric time.

Is Richard politically naive? Both are courageous, cruel, treacherous.

The Relationship Between Fathers and Sons in Shakespeare

These remarks made by Richard III give more insight into his human nature—he is able to understand the terrible implications of his actions and he is able to acknowledge he has done wrong. Too much of a good thing mars this nearly spotless gem. In act 2, scene 4 of Macbeth: They do in Shakespeare!

Othello and Richard III Essay

Shakespeare's debt to Plautus and tragicomic interpretation are looked at. Note carefully the ambiguity of Mowbray's response in 1. The closer a paper is to the top of a page, the more recently it was written. Thersites as the Fool in Shakespeare's "Troilus and Cressida".

Both are murderers, usurpers, tyrants.


The most damaging expression of this is the tone in which he greets the news of John of Gaunt's sickness: Both Richard II and Macbeth deal with the Supernatural result of Usurpation, though in Macbeth features it more prominently, and they use the Supernatural in similar ways.The play Richard II is one of Shakespeare's History Plays and, therefore, isn't bound to the requirements of tragedy.

This is an interesting fact to. The Progressive Character of Macbeth Kenneth Deighton. The character of Macbeth, as presented in the play, is a progressive one. As the plot proceeds his few good qualities disappear, while the evil become more and more developed.

"Macbeth" comes out as one of William Shakespeare's darkest and murkiest plays, most likely as a result of being written during one of Shakespeare's darkest times in his own life. This play strays away from the more common Shakespearean formula that contains a hero and his demise resulting from a specific tragic flaw.

Representations of Kingship and Power in Shakespeare's Second Tetralogy Amanda Mabillard Since it is impossible to know Shakespeare's attitudes, beliefs, and play writing methodology, we can only present hypotheses, based upon textual evidence, regarding his authorial intention and the underlying didactic message found in the second.

Similarly, the tyrannized nobles in Richard II find the solution to their bondage in revolt, as does Scotland under Macbeth.


Like much of the western tradition going before him, Shakespeare had great reverence for legitimate monarchs but also seems to have had no doubt that under sufficiently aggravated tyranny, violence was a fully legitimate. From the Paper: "All of these conflicting ideas about the supernatural and religion Shakespeare infused into his plays.

For example, in Shakespeare's plays, the .

An analysis of the flaws of shakespeares richard ii and macbeth
Rated 0/5 based on 6 review